The enterprise AI land grab is on. Glean is building the layer beneath the interface.
Executive Summary
The enterprise AI landscape is experiencing a massive land grab as companies race to secure their position in the artificial intelligence ecosystem. While many focus on building flashy user interfaces and consumer-facing AI applications, Glean is taking a different approach by constructing the foundational infrastructure layer that powers enterprise AI systems. This strategy positions them as the "picks and shovels" provider during the AI gold rush, potentially creating more sustainable long-term value than companies competing solely on interface design.
Glean's approach centers on building robust data connectivity, search capabilities and knowledge management systems that other AI applications can leverage. Rather than creating another chatbot or AI assistant, they're developing the underlying architecture that makes enterprise AI actually work at scale. This infrastructure-first strategy could prove crucial as businesses move beyond AI experimentation toward production deployments that require enterprise-grade reliability, security and integration capabilities.
The Infrastructure Play in Enterprise AI
When you look at the current AI market, there's a clear pattern emerging. Everyone's rushing to build the most impressive user interface, the smartest chatbot or the most intuitive AI assistant. But here's the thing – these flashy applications are only as good as the data and systems they can access. That's where Glean's strategy becomes interesting.
Think about it like building a house. Most AI companies are focused on designing beautiful front doors and impressive facades. Glean is digging the foundation and installing the plumbing. It might not be as glamorous, but without solid infrastructure, those beautiful interfaces won't function when enterprises need them most.
The company's approach involves creating what they call the "connective tissue" between enterprise data sources and AI applications. This includes everything from data ingestion and preprocessing to search optimization and knowledge graph construction. While competitors battle over user attention, Glean is building the pipes that make enterprise AI flow smoothly.
Why Infrastructure Matters More Than Interfaces
Here's something many business owners don't realize: the biggest challenge in enterprise AI isn't building smart algorithms or pretty interfaces. It's getting AI systems to work reliably with messy, distributed enterprise data. Companies have information scattered across dozens of systems – CRM platforms, document repositories, databases, cloud storage, email systems and legacy applications that haven't been updated since the early 2000s.
Most AI applications struggle with this reality. They work great in demos with clean, structured data but fall apart when confronted with the chaos of real enterprise environments. That's exactly the problem Glean is solving by focusing on the infrastructure layer.
Consider a typical scenario: a sales team wants to use AI to analyze customer interactions and predict deal outcomes. The relevant data might be spread across Salesforce, email systems, Slack conversations, proposal documents in SharePoint and call recordings in various platforms. Before any AI magic can happen, someone needs to connect, normalize and make sense of all that information. That's infrastructure work, and it's incredibly complex.
The Technical Architecture Behind Enterprise AI
Glean's infrastructure approach involves several key technical components that most people don't think about but are absolutely critical for enterprise AI success. Let's break down what they're actually building.
Data Connectivity and Integration
The first challenge is connecting to enterprise data sources. This isn't just about APIs – though those are important. It's about handling authentication, managing data permissions, dealing with rate limits and ensuring secure data transfer. Many enterprise systems weren't designed with AI integration in mind, so creating reliable connections requires deep technical expertise.
Glean has built connectors for hundreds of enterprise applications, each one requiring custom logic to handle that system's quirks and limitations. This connector ecosystem becomes increasingly valuable as more AI applications need to access the same data sources.
Search and Retrieval Systems
Once you can access enterprise data, the next challenge is making it searchable and retrievable at scale. This goes way beyond simple keyword matching. Enterprise search needs to understand context, handle synonyms, respect security permissions and return results fast enough for real-time AI applications.
The retrieval component is particularly crucial for what's known as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. These are AI applications that combine large language models with real-time data retrieval to provide accurate, up-to-date responses. The quality of the retrieval system directly impacts the quality of the AI's responses.
Knowledge Graph Construction
Perhaps most importantly, Glean is building systems that can automatically construct knowledge graphs from enterprise data. These graphs represent relationships between different pieces of information – connecting people to projects, documents to decisions and concepts to outcomes.
This knowledge graph approach is what separates enterprise-grade AI from consumer applications. While consumer AI can rely on broad, general knowledge, enterprise AI needs deep understanding of specific company context, relationships and domain expertise.
Real-World Applications and Use Cases
To understand why Glean's infrastructure approach matters, let's look at some real-world scenarios where this foundation becomes critical.
Customer Support Automation
Imagine you're implementing AI-powered customer support. The interface might be a simple chat widget, but behind the scenes, the system needs to access customer history from your CRM, previous support tickets, product documentation, billing information and internal troubleshooting guides. Without robust infrastructure, your AI assistant becomes a expensive way to frustrate customers.
With proper infrastructure, the same chat interface can provide contextually relevant responses by pulling information from multiple systems in real-time. The customer gets better service, and your support team can focus on complex issues that truly require human intervention.
Sales Intelligence and Forecasting
Sales teams are eager to use AI for better forecasting and deal analysis. But effective sales AI needs access to email conversations, meeting notes, proposal documents, competitive intelligence, customer interaction history and market data. Most sales AI tools fail because they can only access a fraction of the relevant information.
Companies building on Glean's infrastructure can create sales AI applications that actually understand the full context of each deal, leading to more accurate forecasts and better strategic recommendations.
Compliance and Risk Management
In regulated industries, AI applications need to maintain detailed audit trails, respect data governance policies and ensure compliance with various regulations. This requires infrastructure that can track data lineage, maintain security controls and provide transparency into AI decision-making processes.
Building this kind of enterprise-grade compliance into AI applications is extremely complex. By handling it at the infrastructure layer, Glean enables AI developers to focus on their core functionality while ensuring their applications meet enterprise requirements.
Strategic Implications for the AI Market
Glean's infrastructure-first approach has broader implications for how the enterprise AI market might evolve. As noted in recent industry analysis, the current AI land grab is creating opportunities for companies that focus on enabling other AI applications rather than competing with them directly.
This strategy mirrors successful platform plays in other technology sectors. Amazon Web Services didn't try to build every possible web application – they built the infrastructure that enables thousands of other companies to build applications more effectively. Microsoft didn't try to create every possible business software – they built Office as a platform that other developers could extend and integrate with.
If Glean executes successfully, they could become the AWS of enterprise AI – the underlying platform that powers a vast ecosystem of AI applications. This would be incredibly valuable, as infrastructure providers often capture more long-term value than applications built on top of them.
Challenges and Competitive Dynamics
Of course, focusing on infrastructure isn't without risks. Infrastructure providers need to achieve significant scale to be profitable, and they're often less visible to end users than application providers. This can make it harder to build brand recognition and justify premium pricing.
There's also competition from major cloud providers like Microsoft, Google and Amazon, who are building their own AI infrastructure offerings. These companies have massive resources and existing enterprise relationships, making them formidable competitors.
However, Glean's specialized focus on enterprise AI infrastructure could give them advantages in terms of feature depth and implementation speed. While cloud giants need to balance many priorities, Glean can focus entirely on solving enterprise AI infrastructure challenges.
What This Means for Business Leaders
If you're evaluating AI solutions for your organization, Glean's approach offers some important lessons. First, pay attention to the infrastructure capabilities of any AI vendor you're considering. Ask detailed questions about data integration, security, scalability and compliance features.
Second, consider whether you want to build AI applications on specialized infrastructure platforms or try to create everything from scratch. Building your own AI infrastructure is possible, but it requires significant technical expertise and ongoing maintenance that might distract from your core business objectives.
Finally, think about the long-term implications of your AI architecture decisions. Choosing infrastructure providers that can grow with your needs and support multiple use cases will be more valuable than point solutions that solve individual problems in isolation.
Key Takeaways
Glean's infrastructure-first approach to enterprise AI represents a strategic bet that the real value in AI will come from enabling platforms rather than standalone applications. By building the foundational layer that connects enterprise data to AI systems, they're positioning themselves as an essential component of the enterprise AI ecosystem.
For business leaders, this highlights the importance of evaluating AI solutions based on their infrastructure capabilities, not just their user interfaces. The most impressive demo might not translate to production success without robust underlying systems.
For AI developers and automation consultants, Glean's strategy demonstrates the potential value of focusing on enablement rather than direct competition. Building tools and platforms that make other AI applications more successful could be more sustainable than trying to create the ultimate AI application.
The enterprise AI land grab is indeed underway, but the winners might not be the companies with the flashiest interfaces. Instead, success might belong to those who solve the hard, unglamorous problems that make enterprise AI actually work at scale. Glean's infrastructure-focused approach could prove that sometimes the most valuable position in a gold rush is selling picks and shovels to the miners.